Skip to main content

Designs

What is a Design? (Definition - Aesthetic Appearance)

Explanation:

Design law, under the Indian Designs Act, 2000, protects the ornamental or aesthetic aspects of a manufactured article. It's about the visual appearance of a product, not its function or how it works. A design must appeal solely to the eye; it's judged by how it looks. The design must be new and original (not previously published or registered) and should be distinct from known designs. Functional features are not protected by design law (those are for patents).

Indian Real-Life Example:

Consider the design of a smartphone:

  • Design Protection: Design law can protect the shape of the phone casing, the arrangement of buttons, the look of the camera module, the visual pattern on the back, etc. – the overall aesthetic appearance.
  • Patent Protection (Separate): Patents would protect the internal technology that makes the phone work – the processor, screen technology, camera sensors, software algorithms, etc. – the functional aspects.

Design protection is about preventing competitors from making products that look confusingly similar to your product's distinctive visual design.

Key Takeaway:

Design law is focused on protecting the eye appeal of products – their aesthetic features. It's about making products visually distinctive and preventing copycats from capitalizing on a product's attractive appearance. Functionality is dealt with by patents, while designs protect the visual form.

Conditions for Design Registration (Novelty and Visual Appeal)

Explanation:

To get a design registered in India, it must primarily meet these conditions:

  • Novelty and Originality: The design must be new and original. It shouldn't be identical to any design already published or registered in India or elsewhere before the date of application. It must be distinctive and not just a commonplace or standard design.

    • Indian Real-Life Example: A design for a new type of chair cannot be registered if it's virtually identical to a chair design that has been sold in furniture stores in India for the past year. It needs to be visually different and not just a trivial variation of an existing design.

  • Visual Appeal (Eye Appeal): The design must appeal solely to the eye. The design's aesthetic features must be what attracts a customer's attention. It's a subjective test, but it's about whether the design is visually appealing and distinctive from an aesthetic standpoint.

    • Indian Real-Life Example: The sleek, minimalist design of Apple products is often cited as examples of designs with strong visual appeal. The clean lines and aesthetic simplicity are part of their brand and are protected by design registrations.

  • Not Purely Functional: The design should not be primarily dictated by function or technical requirements. If the shape of a product is solely determined by how it works, it's less likely to be registrable as a design (it might be more suited for patent protection if it's also inventive and useful).

    • Indian Real-Life Example: The shape of a standard screwdriver is primarily dictated by its function – to grip and turn screws. It's unlikely that the basic shape of a screwdriver would be registrable as a design because its form is largely functional. However, a uniquely shaped, ergonomically designed screwdriver handle with distinctive visual patterns could potentially be design-registrable if it's novel and visually appealing beyond its pure functionality.

Key Takeaway:

Design registration is granted for new and original visual designs that are aesthetically appealing and not solely dictated by function. It's about protecting the look and feel of a product.

Duration of Design Protection

Explanation:

In India, design registration provides protection for a limited period:

  • Initial Period: 10 years: Design registration is initially valid for 10 years from the date of registration.
  • Renewal for 5 Years: It can be renewed once for a further period of 5 years, making the maximum total term 15 years.
  • No Further Renewal: After the maximum 15-year term, the design protection expires, and the design enters the public domain.

Indian Real-Life Example:

A company registers the design for a uniquely shaped type of footwear (like Crocs, for instance). They get design protection for 10 years, which they can extend for another 5 years. After a maximum of 15 years, the design registration expires, and competitors can then legally copy the exact visual design of that footwear without infringing the design right.

Key Takeaway:

Design protection is for a shorter duration compared to patents or trademarks. The limited term reflects the nature of designs as often being tied to fashion trends and evolving consumer preferences.

Key Design Case: Crocs Inc. USA V Liberty Shoes Ltd. (Originality Requirement for Design Patents)

Explanation:

The Crocs Inc. USA V Liberty Shoes Ltd. case is a significant Indian design law case that clarified the requirement of "originality" for design registration.

  • Case Summary:
    • Crocs Inc. USA, famous for its distinctive clog-style footwear, sued Liberty Shoes Ltd. in India for design infringement, claiming that Liberty was copying their registered design.
    • Court Ruling: The Indian court cancelled Crocs' registered design and dismissed their infringement claim. The court found that Crocs' design lacked originality. It was considered to be a combination of pre-existing, known design elements (like clogs, straps, ventilation holes) and not sufficiently "new" or "original" in its overall visual appearance to warrant design protection.
    • Originality Requirement Emphasized: The court emphasized that for a design to be registrable and protectable, it must be a genuinely new and original intellectual property right created after significant time, labor, and effort. Minor "trade variations" or combinations of existing design features are not enough to establish originality.

Indian Real-Life Example:

The Crocs case means that while the brand name "Crocs" (trademark) is still protected, the basic clog shape itself was not deemed sufficiently original to be exclusively owned as a design in India. This allows other footwear manufacturers in India to produce similar clog-style shoes without infringing on Crocs' design rights, as long as they don't copy other distinctive elements like logos or trademarks.

Key Takeaway:

The Crocs case is a key precedent in Indian design law. It underscores that design registration requires a genuine level of originality and visual distinctiveness, not just minor variations of existing product appearances. It protects truly novel and aesthetically significant product designs, but not commonplace or obvious design features.

Back to top