Skip to main content

Direct and indirect Labour cost, methods of payment of wages including Incentive schemes (Halsey, Rowan, Taylor).

Direct and Indirect Labor Cost

Direct labor costs are the wages paid to employees who are directly involved in the production of a good or service. Their efforts can be directly traced to the creation of a specific product. 🧑‍🏭

  • Examples: Wages of assembly line workers, machinists, carpenters building furniture, or bakers making bread.

Indirect labor costs are the wages paid to employees who support the production process but are not directly involved in creating the final product. These costs cannot be easily or economically traced to a specific product unit and are typically classified as manufacturing overhead. 🧹

  • Examples: Salaries of factory supervisors, maintenance staff, quality control inspectors, cleaners in the factory, or security guards.

Methods of Payment of Wages

Methods of wage payment determine how employees are compensated for their work. These methods can be broadly categorized into time-based systems and output-based (piece-rate) systems, often combined with incentive schemes to boost productivity.

  1. Time Rate System: Workers are paid based on the time they spend at work (e.g., hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly wages). This system guarantees a minimum income and is easy to calculate. It's common for jobs where output is hard to measure or quality is paramount.
  2. Piece Rate System: Workers are paid based on the number of units they produce or the tasks they complete. This incentivizes higher output but can sometimes compromise quality if not managed well.

Incentive Schemes

Incentive schemes aim to motivate workers to increase their efficiency and productivity by offering additional remuneration beyond their basic wages. They share the benefits of increased output between the employer and the employee.

Here are three prominent incentive schemes:

1. Halsey Premium Plan (Halsey Plan) 💰

The Halsey Plan is a time-based incentive system where a standard time is set for completing a job. If a worker completes the job in less than the standard time (saves time), they receive a bonus that is a percentage (typically 50%) of the wages for the time saved, in addition to their regular wages for the actual time worked. A minimum wage is guaranteed.

  • Advantages:

    • Guaranteed minimum wage: Provides security for workers.
    • Shared benefit: Both employer and employee benefit from time saved.
    • Simplicity: Relatively easy to understand and calculate.
    • Reduced labor cost per unit: As output increases without a proportional increase in wages.

  • Disadvantages:

    • Less incentive for high efficiency: Workers might feel that they aren't fully rewarded for their extra effort, as they only get a percentage of the saved time's wages.
    • Potential for compromise on quality: Workers may rush to save time, potentially affecting the quality of work.

2. Rowan Premium Plan 🚀

The Rowan Plan is another time-based incentive scheme, similar to Halsey, but the bonus calculation differs. The bonus is a proportion of the wages for the time taken, and this proportion is determined by the ratio of time saved to the standard time. It also guarantees a minimum wage.

  • Advantages:

    • Guaranteed minimum wage: Provides security.
    • Bonus increases with efficiency: Workers are rewarded for saving time.
    • Automatic check on over-speeding: The bonus rate decreases if too much time is saved (beyond a certain point), which can discourage excessive rushing and help maintain quality. This is a key difference from Halsey.
    • Employer benefits from reduced per-unit fixed costs.

  • Disadvantages:

    • More complex calculation: Can be harder for workers to understand compared to Halsey.
    • Bonus diminishes after a certain point: If workers save more than 50% of the standard time, the effective bonus rate starts decreasing, which might demotivate highly efficient workers.

3. Taylor's Differential Piece-Rate System 🎯

Introduced by F.W. Taylor, this system is a strict piece-rate plan that uses two different piece rates: a higher rate for workers who achieve or exceed the standard output and a lower rate for those who fall below the standard. There is no guaranteed minimum wage under this system. It aims to strongly penalize inefficient workers and significantly reward efficient ones.

  • Mechanism:

    1. A standard output (or standard time per unit) is established.
    2. Two piece rates are set:
      • Lower Piece Rate: Applied if a worker's output is below the standard. (e.g., 80% of the normal piece rate)
      • Higher Piece Rate: Applied if a worker's output is at or above the standard. (e.g., 120% of the normal piece rate)

  • Advantages:

    • Strong incentive for efficiency: Highly motivates workers to achieve or exceed targets.
    • Eliminates inefficient workers: Those consistently below standard will find it difficult to earn a living wage, prompting them to improve or leave.
    • Reduces supervision costs: Workers are self-motivated to produce.

  • Disadvantages:

    • No guaranteed minimum wage: This can cause financial insecurity and resistance from workers or unions.
    • Very harsh on inefficient workers: A small drop in output can lead to a significant decrease in earnings.
    • Focus on quantity over quality: Workers might sacrifice quality to meet the standard and earn the higher rate.
    • Difficulty in setting accurate standards: If standards are too high, it can demotivate all workers.
    • Less common today: Due to its harshness and lack of wage security, it's rarely used in its pure form in modern industrial settings.
Back to top