Skip to main content

Reflecting on The Rent-a-Runway journey

Post-MVP: Beta Launch and Learning

After successfully validating their core assumptions through various low-fidelity MVPs (trunk shows, mail-order catalogs), Rent the Runway moved to a more refined product: a beta version of their website.

  • Beta Launch Strategy: They opted for a limited beta launch to approximately 5,000 customers instead of a full public launch. This allowed them to gather valuable insights and make necessary adjustments before a wider rollout.
  • Key Learnings: The beta launch revealed that customers frequently had questions regarding sizing, fit, and styling advice. They needed support in making rental choices.
  • Adaptation: In response, Rent the Runway immediately integrated styling advice as a core part of their solution, demonstrating their commitment to customer feedback and iterative refinement of their business model. This responsiveness allowed them to maintain a strong pulse on customer needs.

Evolving Value Proposition and Unfair Advantage

While their initial unique value proposition was convenience and cost-effectiveness for accessing designer clothes, Rent the Runway realized something more profound: they were making women feel "beautiful and confident every time." This evolution of their value proposition highlights how understanding customer emotional response can deepen a venture's purpose.

Over time, Rent the Runway also developed a significant "unfair advantage" – strong relationships with designers. Initially, they lacked this, but by systematically engaging and proving their model, they built a "moat" that differentiated them.

Systematic and Cost-Effective Validation

The Rent the Runway journey exemplifies a highly systematic and cost-effective approach to validating hypotheses. They avoided large, upfront investments by using simple MVPs and quickly moving forward once assumptions were validated.

  • Strengths:

    • Continuous Learning: They demonstrated excellent continuous learning throughout their journey.
    • Multiple MVPs and Real-World Testing: They deployed various MVPs and conducted real-world tests, keeping customers involved in the development process.
    • Iterative Process: Their business model evolved iteratively, driven by constant listening to customer feedback.

  • Areas for Improvement:

    • Inventory Management: Despite high demand, they faced challenges in meeting it due to inventory issues.
    • Technology Leadership: They should have hired a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) earlier. Their technology infrastructure was not as robust as it needed to be for a company positioning itself as "Netflix for fashion." They outsourced and changed vendors, leading to a "catch-up mode" in tech.
    • Fortuitous Lack of Competition: Their initial lack of direct competition allowed them to survive operational glitches and inventory shortages, as customers had no alternatives. Had competition existed, these issues could have severely impacted customer retention.

Achieving Product-Market Fit

The crucial question for any startup is whether they have achieved product-market fit. Strong indicators suggested they had:

  • Demonstrated Demand:

    • Rapid User Growth: They experienced very rapid user growth, with 150,000 registrations in a few months after launch.
    • Repeat Usage: There was significant repeat usage from customers, indicating stickiness and loyalty.
    • Referrals and Emotional Response: Customers were referring others, and there was a strong positive emotional response on social media.

  • Value Metrics vs. Vanity Metrics: While high registration rates (150,000 users) can be a vanity metric, the more critical value metric is the rental rate (conversion from registration to actual rentals).

    • Calculation of Conversion Rate: Assuming 12.5% repeat renters (averaging 2.5 rentals each) and 2000 total orders, the number of unique renters was calculated to be approximately 1,684. Taking the midpoint of registered users (75,000), the conversion rate was about 2.3%.
    • Benchmarking: This 2.3% conversion rate is considered good compared to other e-commerce businesses (2.453% is typical). This confirmed robust demand.

  • Profit Potential: While not profitable in the early stages, the potential for profitability existed.

    • Key Metric: The crucial metric for profitability was how many times a dress could be rented to recover its procurement cost.
    • Cost Structure: Dresses were procured at 40-50% of retail price (assumed 45%). Rentals were charged at 10-15% of retail (assumed 12.5%).
    • Breakeven Point: Initially, it seemed a dress needed to be rented 3-4 times to recover cost. However, factoring in that two dresses were shipped for every rental (for fit), the breakeven point doubled to 7-8 times per dress.
    • Early Indication: With 2000 orders from 700-800 dresses in inventory, they were already averaging 2-2.5 rentals per dress in a short period, suggesting future profitability was likely.

Roadblocks to Long-Term Profitability

Several unknowns and challenges remained for long-term profitability:

  • Dress Condition and Turnaround Time: The condition of returned dresses, the time and cost for dry cleaning, and repairs were critical.
  • Product Availability: Ensuring consistent availability of in-demand dresses.
  • Fashion Trends: Dresses could go out of fashion, reducing their rental lifespan.
  • Seasonality: The initial high demand might have been due to the holiday season (November-December), and year-round demand was yet to be fully understood.

Future Strategy: Expansion vs. Operational Improvement

Rent the Runway faced a strategic dilemma: should they focus on improving operations or expand rapidly to meet robust demand?

  • Arguments for Operational Focus:
    • Addressing existing challenges like inventory and website issues is crucial before scaling.
  • Arguments for Expansion:
    • There was strong customer love and demand, which should not be turned away.
    • Lack of immediate competition offered a "luxury" to pursue both operational improvements and expansion in parallel.

If they were to expand, the question then became: introduce more products or target older demographics?

  • Expanding to Older Demographics (Pros & Cons):

    • Pros: Expands customer segment; designers are more comfortable as it doesn't cannibalize sales from existing customer base. Operationally easier as the core dress rental model (laundry, packaging, shipping) remains the same.
    • Cons: Requires different inventory to cater to older sensibilities. Styling advice and customer acquisition channels (e.g., marketing via different platforms) would need to adapt.

  • Introducing More Products (e.g., Accessories, Shoes, Bags) (Pros & Cons):

    • Pros: High demand for accessories; potentially higher profit margins.
    • Cons: Requires onboarding different designers (not just dress designers). Website optimization needed to render new product categories. Increased operational complexity in packaging, shipping (e.g., breakage concerns), and repair/maintenance for different product types. Stylists need new training for pairing accessories. It's a significant operational "double click" that can be more complex than it appears.

Subsequent Growth and Challenges

Rent the Runway successfully raised capital earlier than expected and experienced rapid growth. In a few years, they grew to a million members, with 25,000 dresses and partnerships with over 140 designers.

However, the COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges, impacting the entire fashion industry. Their IPO around the same time was ill-timed, and they faced a tough period. The company has since been in a rebuilding phase.

Back to top