Treatment of Process Losses
Treatment of Process Losses in Process Costing
1. Introduction
- Real‑world reality: Processes incur losses, wastage, defective units.
-
Loss timing:
- Throughout process (e.g., chemical evaporation)
- At end of process (e.g., assembly defect detected)
-
Loss classification:
- Normal loss → expected in efficient operations
- Abnormal loss → unexpected, avoidable
2. Cost Treatment Principles
Loss Type | Treatment |
---|---|
Normal Loss | Cost absorbed into unit cost (WG & WIP) |
Abnormal Loss | Separated and charged as period cost below COGS |
3. Example Setup
- Input: 100 L chemical @ ₹100/L → Material cost = ₹10,000
- Conversion cost: ₹8,000
-
Outputs:
- Finished goods = 60 L
- Work‑in‑Process = 35 L (100% mat, 40% conv)
- Loss = 5 L
4. Normal Loss Treatment
-
Determine equivalent units (EU)
- Material EU = 60 + 35 = 95 EU
- Conversion EU = 60 + (35 × 40%) = 74 EU
-
Compute cost/EU
- Material cost/EU = ₹10,000 ÷ 95 ≈ ₹105.26
- Conversion cost/EU = ₹8,000 ÷ 74 ≈ ₹108.11
-
Unit cost = ₹105.26 + ₹108.11 ≈ ₹213.37
-
Allocate costs
- Completed (60 L × ₹213.37) ≈ ₹12,802
- WIP (35 EU mat × ₹105.26 + 14 EU conv × ₹108.11) ≈ ₹5,198
- Loss cost buried in unit costs
-
Profit
- Sales (60 L × ₹250) = ₹15,000
- Cost of goods = ₹12,802
- Profit = ₹2,198
5. Abnormal Loss Treatment
-
Re‑compute EU including loss
- Material EU = 60 + 35 + 5 = 100 EU
- Conversion EU = 60 + 5 + (35 × 40%) = 79 EU
-
Cost/EU
- Material cost/EU = ₹10,000 ÷ 100 = ₹100
- Conversion cost/EU = ₹8,000 ÷ 79 ≈ ₹101.27
-
Unit cost = ₹100 + ₹101.27 ≈ ₹201.27
-
Allocate
- Completed (60 L × ₹201.27) ≈ ₹12,076
- WIP (35 EU mat × ₹100 + 14 EU conv × ₹101.27) ≈ ₹4,918
- Abnormal loss (5 L × ₹201.27) ≈ ₹1,006 (period cost)
-
Profit
- Sales = ₹15,000
- COGS = ₹12,076
- Gross margin = ₹2,923
- Less abnormal loss = ₹1,006
- Net profit = ₹1,917
6. Comparison & Managerial Implications
- Normal loss treatment → higher current profit (shifts loss cost forward)
- Abnormal loss treatment → immediate recognition as expense
- Behavioral risk: Managers may prefer normalizing loss to inflate profit
-
Recommendation:
- Clearly define normal vs. abnormal causes
- Enforce consistent costing policy to avoid misuse