Skip to main content

Treatment of Process Losses

Treatment of Process Losses in Process Costing

1. Introduction

  • Real‑world reality: Processes incur losses, wastage, defective units.
  • Loss timing:
    • Throughout process (e.g., chemical evaporation)
    • At end of process (e.g., assembly defect detected)
  • Loss classification:
    • Normal loss â†’ expected in efficient operations
    • Abnormal loss â†’ unexpected, avoidable

2. Cost Treatment Principles

Loss TypeTreatment
Normal LossCost absorbed into unit cost (WG & WIP)
Abnormal LossSeparated and charged as period cost below COGS

3. Example Setup

  • Input: 100 L chemical @ ₹100/L → Material cost = ₹10,000
  • Conversion cost: ₹8,000
  • Outputs:
    • Finished goods = 60 L
    • Work‑in‑Process = 35 L (100% mat, 40% conv)
    • Loss = 5 L

4. Normal Loss Treatment

  1. Determine equivalent units (EU)

    • Material EU = 60 + 35 = 95 EU
    • Conversion EU = 60 + (35 × 40%) = 74 EU
  2. Compute cost/EU

    • Material cost/EU = ₹10,000 ÷ 95 ≈ ₹105.26
    • Conversion cost/EU = ₹8,000 ÷ 74 ≈ ₹108.11
  3. Unit cost = ₹105.26 + ₹108.11 ≈ ₹213.37

  4. Allocate costs

    • Completed (60 L × ₹213.37) ≈ ₹12,802
    • WIP (35 EU mat × ₹105.26 + 14 EU conv × ₹108.11) ≈ ₹5,198
    • Loss cost buried in unit costs
  5. Profit

    • Sales (60 L × ₹250) = ₹15,000
    • Cost of goods = ₹12,802
    • Profit = ₹2,198

5. Abnormal Loss Treatment

  1. Re‑compute EU including loss

    • Material EU = 60 + 35 + 5 = 100 EU
    • Conversion EU = 60 + 5 + (35 × 40%) = 79 EU
  2. Cost/EU

    • Material cost/EU = ₹10,000 ÷ 100 = ₹100
    • Conversion cost/EU = ₹8,000 ÷ 79 ≈ ₹101.27
  3. Unit cost = ₹100 + ₹101.27 ≈ ₹201.27

  4. Allocate

    • Completed (60 L × ₹201.27) ≈ ₹12,076
    • WIP (35 EU mat × ₹100 + 14 EU conv × ₹101.27) ≈ ₹4,918
    • Abnormal loss (5 L × ₹201.27) ≈ ₹1,006 (period cost)
  5. Profit

    • Sales = ₹15,000
    • COGS = ₹12,076
    • Gross margin = ₹2,923
    • Less abnormal loss = ₹1,006
    • Net profit = ₹1,917

6. Comparison & Managerial Implications

  • Normal loss treatment → higher current profit (shifts loss cost forward)
  • Abnormal loss treatment → immediate recognition as expense
  • Behavioral risk: Managers may prefer normalizing loss to inflate profit
  • Recommendation:
    • Clearly define normal vs. abnormal causes
    • Enforce consistent costing policy to avoid misuse