Skip to main content

9. IHRM Models

International Human Resource Management (IHRM) models provide frameworks for understanding the complexities of managing human resources across national boundaries. These models help organizations identify key factors and processes involved in IHRM and guide the development of effective HR strategies. This document will outline and compare several prominent IHRM models.

1. The Harvard Model

  • Perlmutter'Origin: Developed at Harvard Business School, it's Model:also known as the "best fit" model.
  • Focus: Emphasizes the strategic integration of HR policies with the overall business strategy. It's a contingency-based model that recognizes the importance of external and internal contexts.
  • Key Components:
    • Stakeholder Interests: Acknowledges the diverse interests of various stakeholders (shareholders, employees, management, community, etc.).
    • Situational Factors: Highlights the influence of both external factors (economic, social, political) and internal factors (organizational structure, technology, culture) on HR decisions.
    • HRM Policy Choices: Focuses on strategic HR policy choices related to employee influence, HR flow, rewards, and work systems.
    • HR Outcomes: Analyzes the degreeimpact of centralizationHRM orpolicies decentralizationon key outcomes such as commitment, competence, congruence, and cost-effectiveness.
    • Long-Term Consequences: Evaluates the long-term effects of decision-makingHR inpolicies HR.
      • on
    • Includesorganizational ethnocentric, polycentric, regiocentric,well-being and geocentricsocietal approaches.welfare.
  • Dowling'sIHRM Model:Perspective: Adapts to various cultural and economic contexts, recognizing that HR practices need to fit specific situations. It emphasizes aligning global HR practices with the broader strategic goals of the organization while considering local constraints.
  • Strengths: Comprehensive, strategic, integrates external context, links HRM to business strategy.
  • Weaknesses: Complex, lacks specificity on implementation details, can be challenging to apply in volatile environments.

2. The Warwick Model

  • Origin: Developed at the University of Warwick, this is a contingency-based framework.
  • Focus: Explores the relationships between external context, organizational context, HR practices, and organizational outcomes. It emphasizes how both internal and external factors interact to shape HR strategies.
  • Key Components:
    • External Context: Includes political, economic, social, technological, and legal factors affecting HR practices.
    • Organizational Context: Covers organizational strategy, culture, structure, and technology.
    • HRM Practices: Encompasses various HR functions such as recruitment, selection, training, performance management, and compensation.
    • HRM Outcomes: Focuses on the results of HR practices, such as employee commitment, performance, and productivity.
  • IHRM Perspective: Considers how national culture, international labor laws, and global economic factors affect IHRM policies. It highlights the need for adapting HR practices based on these contextual factors.
  • Strengths: Focuses on external and internal context, dynamic view of HR, emphasizes fit and contingency.
  • Weaknesses: Complex and less prescriptive, not as detailed as other models in terms of HR functions, can be difficult to apply in practice.

3. Contextual Model

  • Focus: Emphasizes the influencecritical role of context (internal and external) in shaping HR strategies and practices.
  • Key Components:
    • Internal Context: Includes organizational size, structure, culture, and technology.
    • External Context: Includes political, economic, social, cultural, technological, and legal factors at both national and international levels.
    • HRM Activities: Encompasses various HR functions, including recruitment, training, compensation, and performance management.
    • Organizational Performance: The outcomes influenced by HRM, such as profitability, growth, and employee satisfaction.
  • IHRM Perspective: Highlights that HR practices need to be adjusted based on local contexts, including cultural values, labor laws, and economic conditions. It encourages adapting HR policies to fit the countryspecific national context rather than enforcing standardized global practices.
  • Strengths: Simple, versatile, strong emphasis on context, adaptable to different settings.
  • Weaknesses: Can be too general, lacks specificity, does not provide a prescriptive approach to HR practices.

4. The 5-P’s Model

  • Origin: Developed by Randall Schuler and Susan Jackson, the 5-P model emphasizes five critical elements of origin,HR hoststrategy country,that need to be aligned.
  • Focus: Emphasizes the importance of aligning HR activities with business strategy by focusing on five critical elements of HR.
  • Key Components:
    • Philosophy: Articulates the organization's values and thirdbeliefs countryabout nationalsits employees.
    • Policies: Specifies HR policies to support the philosophy.
    • Programs: Detailed initiatives used to deliver on IHRMHR policies.
    • Practices: Actual HR processes used in daily operations.
    • Processes: Procedures and systems used to implement HR activities.
  • IHRM Perspective: Requires that all five Ps be adapted and aligned across borders. It stresses the importance of considering local cultural norms and regulatory frameworks while maintaining global strategic alignment.
  • Strengths: Simple, practical, focuses on alignment of HR components, emphasizes clear and strategic thinking about HR.
  • Weaknesses: Less emphasis on external context, may not fully address the complexities of IHRM.

5. The HarvardMichigan/Matching Model:Model

  • Origin: Developed at the University of Michigan, it is also called the "matching model."
  • Focus: Emphasizes the strategic alignment of HR practices with the overall business strategy, emphasizing the fit between people and organizational needs.
  • Key Components:
    • Strategic Business Goals: Clarifies organizational objectives, strategy, and priorities.
    • HRM Strategy: Aligns HR policies and practices with the strategic goals of the organization.
    • HR Practices: Involves HR activities such as recruitment, training, and performance management.
    • Employee Performance and Outcomes: Focuses on the strategic roleimpact of HRMHR inpractices achievingon employee performance and organizational results.
  • IHRM Perspective: Stresses the importance of adapting HR practices to align with both the global strategic goals and local contextual constraints. It aims for a tight fit between HR strategies and the international business environment.
  • Strengths: Focuses on strategic fit, emphasizes linking people and organizational needs, clear focus on performance outcomes.
  • Weaknesses: Limited attention to external environmental context, can be overly rationalistic.

6. The Guest Model

  • Origin: Developed by David Guest, this model integrates both hard and soft aspects of HRM.
  • Focus: Focuses on the key aspects of HR strategies, encompassing both "hard" (quantitative, performance-based) and "soft" (qualitative, human-focused) dimensions.
  • Key Components:
    • HR Strategies: A set of planned activities to support organizational goals.
    • Considers HR Practices: Specific activities implemented to achieve HR strategies.
    • HR Outcomes: The impact of HR activities on factors suchlike ascommitment, situationalquality, factors,and stakeholderflexibility.
      • interests,
    • Financial Outcomes: The impact of HR on organizational performance.
    • Employee Well-Being: Focuses on the effect of HR practices on employee influence,health, morale, and HRM policies and practices.satisfaction.
  • IHRM Perspective: Recognizes that both the "hard" and "soft" aspects of HR need to be adapted to different national contexts. It emphasizes the need for international HR to focus on global objectives while considering local employee needs.
  • Strengths: Integrates hard and soft dimensions of HRM, emphasizes performance and employee well-being, clear focus on HR outcomes.
  • Weaknesses: Can be complex to implement, lacks specificity on implementation, not as practical as other models.

7. European Model of IHRM

  • Focus: Emphasizes employee participation, social responsibility, and long-term workforce development.
  • Characteristics:
    • Strong emphasis on employee rights and social dialogue.
    • Focus on long-term workforce planning and development.
    • Emphasis on work-life balance and employee well-being.
    • Greater involvement of unions and works councils in HR decisions.
  • IHRM Perspective: Reflects the European Union's emphasis on employee rights and social justice. IHRM policies in European MNCs often focus on employee participation, fairness, and long-term workforce development.
  • Strengths: Values employee well-being, promotes social dialogue, long-term orientation, strong labor relations.
  • Weaknesses: Can be less flexible, more costly due to higher labor costs, slower decision-making process due to employee involvement, may face difficulty adapting in non-European contexts.

8. US Model of IHRM

  • Focus: Emphasizes individual performance, merit-based rewards, and efficiency.
  • Characteristics:
    • Greater emphasis on individual performance and meritocracy.
    • Strong focus on short-term results and efficiency.
    • Less emphasis on job security and long-term employment.
    • Lower involvement of unions in HR decisions.
    • Performance-driven compensation systems.
  • IHRM Perspective: Often seeks to transfer home-country HR practices to foreign subsidiaries. This can lead to challenges in cultural contexts that emphasize collectivism and long-term relationships.
  • Strengths: Focuses on performance and efficiency, results-oriented, flexible, can respond quickly to market changes.
  • Weaknesses: Can be less employee-focused, less stable due to short-term orientation, potentially less ethical in terms of fair labor practices, less emphasis on employee well-being.

Conclusion

Each IHRM model offers a different lens for understanding and approaching the complexities of managing HR across borders. The choice of model depends on a range of factors, including organizational strategy, culture, industry, and the specific context of international operations. It is also worth noting that no single model is universally superior, and organizations often integrate elements from multiple frameworks to develop a customized approach that best suits their needs and objectives. Effective IHRM requires an understanding of the various models, a global perspective, adaptability, and a commitment to building strong international teams and practices.

Back to top