Skip to main content

Patents

What is a Patent? (Definition and Exclusive Rights)

Explanation: A patent is a legal right granted by the government for an invention. It acts as a temporary monopoly, allowing the inventor exclusive rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention for a limited period—20 years in India from the date of filing the patent application. In exchange, the inventor must publicly disclose the details of the invention.

Indian Real-Life Example: Suppose an Indian scientist invents a more efficient solar panel technology and patents it:

  • They have the exclusive right to manufacture, sell, and import solar panels using this patented technology in India for 20 years.
  • Competitors cannot legally copy or sell similar solar panels in India without their permission.
  • They can license their patent to other companies, generating revenue.
  • After 20 years, the patent expires, and the technology becomes publicly available.

Key Takeaway: A patent provides a powerful but time-limited exclusive right over an invention, encouraging technological innovation and investment in research and development.


Conditions for Patentability: Novelty, Inventiveness, Utility

Explanation: Not every invention qualifies for a patent. In India, an invention must meet these three essential conditions:

  1. Novelty (Newness): The invention must be new and not publicly known before the patent application.
    • Example: If a modified kitchen utensil design is already described in an online blog post from five years ago, it lacks novelty and cannot be patented.
  2. Inventiveness (Non-Obviousness/Inventive Step): The invention must not be obvious to experts in the relevant technical field.
    • Example: Simply adding an LED light to a bicycle is obvious. However, creating a new braking system that significantly improves safety could be patentable.
  3. Utility (Industrial Applicability): The invention must be useful and capable of being manufactured or used in an industry.
    • Example: A mathematical formula cannot be patented unless it has a practical application, such as improving data compression in software.

Key Takeaway: These criteria ensure patents are granted only for truly innovative, practical, and novel inventions.


The Patenting Process in India (Filing to Grant)

Explanation: Obtaining a patent in India involves multiple steps:

  1. Filing a Patent Application: The application includes a provisional specification (optional, to secure an early filing date) and a complete specification (mandatory, with full invention details).
  2. Publication: The application is published in the Official Gazette 18 months after filing.
  3. Request for Examination: The applicant must request examination within 48 months, or the application is abandoned.
  4. Examination: Patent examiners assess the invention for novelty, inventiveness, and utility, issuing a First Examination Report (FER), usually with objections.
  5. Meeting Objections: The applicant must respond to the FER by amending claims or justifying patentability.
  6. Grant or Refusal: If objections are resolved, the patent is granted; otherwise, it is refused.
  7. Pre-Grant Opposition: Before the grant, third parties can challenge the patent.
  8. Post-Grant Opposition: After the grant, third parties have 12 months to challenge the patent.

Indian Real-Life Example: A startup developing a medical device follows these steps: filing, publication, examination, responding to objections, and finally receiving a patent.

Key Takeaway: The patenting process is rigorous, involving public scrutiny and technical examination before grant.


Duration of Patent Protection

Explanation: In India, a patent lasts 20 years from the filing date and cannot be renewed after expiration. Post-expiration, the invention enters the public domain.

Indian Real-Life Example: A pharmaceutical company patents a new drug. For 20 years, they hold exclusive rights. After expiration, generic manufacturers can legally produce cheaper versions, increasing public access.

Key Takeaway: Patent protection is temporary—it incentivizes innovation but ultimately benefits the public.


Compulsory Licensing of Patents (CL) - Balancing Public Interest

Explanation: Compulsory Licensing (CL) allows the government to authorize others to use a patented invention without the patent holder’s consent in special cases.

Grounds for CL in India:

  • Public Health Crises: Ensures access to essential medicines.
  • Non-Working of Patent: If the patent holder is not making the invention available in India.
  • Unreasonable Pricing: If the patented product is unaffordable.
  • Export to Needy Countries: Allows exports of life-saving medicines to nations lacking manufacturing capabilities.

Indian Real-Life Example: Natco v/s. Bayer: The Indian Patent Office granted CL to Natco Pharma to produce a generic version of Bayer's expensive cancer drug Nexavar, ensuring affordability.

Key Takeaway: CL is a safeguard that balances patent rights with public welfare needs, especially in healthcare.


Government's Power Related to Patents

Explanation: The Indian government retains certain powers over patents:

  1. Government Use of Patented Inventions: The government can use a patented invention for public purposes (e.g., defense, healthcare) without the patent holder’s permission.
  2. Royalty for Government Use: The government may compensate the patent holder, but there’s no obligation if the invention was already in use before patenting.
  3. Patents Undertaken for Public Interest: The government can intervene if a patent is deemed contrary to public interest or policy.

Indian Real-Life Example: During a public health emergency, the Indian government could use patented medical technologies without prior approval.

Key Takeaway: Government intervention in patents is rare but exists to protect national interests and public welfare.


Key Patent Cases in India

  • Novartis v. Union of India (2013): The Supreme Court rejected Novartis' patent for an anti-cancer drug (Glivec) under Section 3(d) of the Patents Act, which prevents evergreening—patents on minor modifications of known drugs.
  • Natco v. Bayer (2012): India’s first compulsory license case, where Natco was allowed to produce Bayer’s cancer drug Nexavar at an affordable price.
  • Crocs v. Liberty Shoes: A case involving design patent originality, where the Indian courts examined whether Crocs’ patented shoe design was truly novel.

Key Takeaway: Patent laws evolve through landmark cases, shaping how intellectual property is protected in India.


Final Thoughts

Patents encourage innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights for a limited period, incentivizing research while ensuring public access to inventions after expiry. India’s patent system balances inventors’ rights with societal needs, allowing for compulsory licensing and government intervention when necessary. Understanding these legal provisions is crucial for businesses, researchers, and policymakers navigating intellectual property rights.